Monday, February 21, 2011

Redemption Has No Place in Pro Football

Redemption was an overriding theme of the NFL this season.  With Michael Vick leading the Eagles to the playoffs to cap off the best season of his career and Ben Roethlisberger appearing in his third Super Bowl after not even playing for the first four games of the season, there has been much made in the media about the “redemption” of these two stars over the past year.  But these are not the grand tales of redemption the media would have us believe.  Vick and Roethlisberger have not, and cannot, prove on the football field that they have redeemed themselves off it.
Roethlisberger was asked countless times at the Super Bowl media day about “off the field distractions.”  About his suspension at the start of this season.  About “overcoming adversity.”  Let’s just be clear about this from the get go.  Alleged rape is not a distraction or adversity.  Roger Goodell did not suspended Roethlisberger for something beyond Big Ben’s control.  He is accused of doing some heinous things, on more than one occasion.  He has no one but himself to blame for this so-called “adversity” he must overcome.  Likewise for Vick.  He didn’t just bet on dog fighting.  He ran the show.  Vick was found guilty in a court of law of some atrocious things.  But now that both have returned to their former on-the-field glory, we as a nation are being asked to forgive, or at least forget.
It is important to recognize the difference between the two cases.  Personally, I have a little bit, a VERY little bit, of an easier time accepting Vick’s renewed stardom.  Sure, I’m an Eagles fan and I can appreciate what he has done for the team this season, but that doesn’t mean I’m going to turn to him as a model of how to bounce back from failure.  I’m not going to praise him as a hero for coming back to the game a better player than he left it.  But Vick stood trial and served nearly two years in jail.  He lost most of his life savings and declared bankruptcy.  He has, since being signed by the Eagles in 2009, lived a fairly clean and quiet life.  He has done charity work with the Humane Society and connects with fans by responding to dozens of tweets every day.  Vick recently reaffirmed his commitment to living a quiet life off the field by refusing to attend a big time Super Bowl party at the Deux Lounge in Dallas which was, confusingly, billed as “The Michael Vick Experience”  (Which is too bad, because it had a really cool video invitation/ trailer).
However, all of this says nothing about whether Vick has truly redeemed himself.  He may be the same cruel, heartless man who founded, housed, and funded Bad Newz Kennels.  He may be being bribed by his publicist or the Eagles to show up at the Humane Society.  Maybe it’s some assistant who charms his fans everyday on Twitter.  Or maybe his time in jail has helped him begin understand how reprehensible his actions were.  Maybe he is trying to make up for what he has done by volunteering.  And maybe he is as grateful for this second chance at life  and football as he says he is.  We, as fans, will never know.  But what we can know is that the number of touchdowns or interceptions he threw this season is no indication of this.
Roethlisberger’s case is different.  Yes, Roethlisberger was never found guilty of any wrongdoing.  But, in some ways, this makes it worse.  There seems to be little doubt that Roethlisberger is a pig who behaved inexcusably that night in Georgia last year, as well as in Lake Tahoe in 2008, regardless of what the courts have been able to prove.  But Roethlisberger has done nothing publicly to indicate that he is remorseful for what happened and that he would never behave that way again.  His tactic has primarily been to ignore that anything happened at all.  And really, what has he lost in this whole ordeal?  A few early season games and a beef jerky sponsorship.  He didn’t serve jail time.  He didn’t go bankrupt.  He didn’t miss entire seasons in the prime of his career.  And what exactly has Roethlisberger done to try repair his reputation, if only in the public eye?  He has never apologized.  He doesn’t volunteer at a battered women’s shelter (which would probably be a bad idea, in any case).  Roethlisberger has paid a very little price for his wrongdoings and has done very little to appear remorseful.  And yet, we again have no idea if Big Ben is sorry.  Maybe he did some real soul searching during those four weeks at the beginning of the season.  We don’t know.
But I can tell you one way that both Roethlisberger and Vick will not prove to me that they are changed men -- by winning football games.  Making up for past sins, redeeming oneself, becoming a changed man are all things that have no place on the gridiron.  Playing ability and morality have almost nothing in common.  Guys play in the NFL because they are good at playing football, not because they have high moral standards or should be our children’s role models.  Admire their physical ability and their mental toughness; leave your parents and preachers to be your role models.  Just don’t expect me to forget the horrible, horrible things Roethlisberger and Vick, and many other NFL players, have done just because they’ve won a few games.

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

New Media and the NFL Lockout


As the hours tick down to Super Bowl XLV, the clock is also ticking down to a more frightening date -- March 4th, 2011.  That’s the day the NFL’s current Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) expires.  NFL Players Union (NFLPA) Executive Director DeMaurice Smith and NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell announced just this Monday that reps from the NFL and NFLPA will meet this Saturday, the day before the Super Bowl, for a “formal bargaining session with both negotiating teams … in [an] effort to reach a new agreement by early March."  As tensions and public attention ramp up, everyone is becoming increasingly anxious to get down to business and, if you believe both sides, make sure there is a football season in 2011.  

An other battle, however, is taking place outside the bargaining room.  NFL players and executives alike have taken to the Internet to win over fans in the court of public opinion.  The NFLPA has definitely taken the offensive online.  Leading the charge is NFLLockout.com.  Here, fans can sign a petition to “Block the Lockout,” count down the hours to the start of the lockout, and read articles on the lockout from all kinds of news sources.  The union is careful to tell the fans what the lockout is about -- economics, equality, healthcare, and history -- and what it is not about -- players’ greed, an unfair CBA in 2006, or owner’s risk.

Beyond the carefully crafted party line, NFLPA executives, as well as current and former players, have taken to the figurative streets to garner sympathy and support for the player’s’ position.  
There was national Let Us Play Day on January 18th when players and fans alike showed there opposition to the lockout by using the Twitter hashtags  #letusplay and #blockthelockout and encouraging friends on Facebook, and, of course, in real life, to sign the petition.  Just a brief look at all of tweets including #LetUsPlay and #BlockTheLockout reveals the broad success of this move to get players vocal and fans active in building momentum for the players’ side of the debate.

NFLPA executives have been active on Twitter by keeping fans updated and responding to comments made by the NFL.  In response to Goodell’s claim that he would take a $1 salary if there is a lockout, for example, Smith tweeted that he would take a 68 cent salary.  Assistant Executive Director of External Affairs George Atallah is a prolific tweeter, updating dozens of times each day.  He responds directly to fans and updates on the negotiation process, giving fans access behind the scenes of the NFLPA.
The greatest source of potential for the NFLPA, both positively and negatively, is the players themselves.  When united, the players can have a huge influence on fans by putting a human face to the lockout.  Online, they can come across as a bunch of regular guys who want only to play the game they love and support their families in doing so.  Some of the more on message tweets are highlighted by the NFLPA here.  However, this tactic has the potential to go very wrong, as in the case of the Hasselbeck-Cromartie spat The players need to present a united front.  Internal bickering brought out into the open seriously hurts the NFLPA position of just trying to get back to playing football.

The NFL has responded with its own online assault.  The primary component is NFLLabor.com and it’s corresponding @nfllabor Twitter account.  Though more tame than most of what we see coming from players, the NFL is nevertheless using the opportunity to take some subtle jabs at the NFLPA.  They are letting fans know that they believe the players currently got a “great deal” and emphasizing Gooddell’s commitment to resolving the dispute by the March 4th deadline.  Goodell himself has a Twitter account but does not update very frequently.  

So, in this new age of social media and around the clock access to newsmakers, both the NFL and the players are wasting no time using technology to their advantage.  But ultimately, how much does it really matter?  No fans are going to be happy if there is a lockout, regardless of who tweets and Facebooks the most.  The real work needs to be done by the big players.  Maybe on Saturday, when Goodell and Smith put down their smartphones and sit down to talk face to face, some actual progress can be made.  In the mean time, I will be glued to my Twitter feed watching it all go down.
-----
For more background info on the CBA, lockout, and what it means for football next season, check out these two great articles.